Author: A. Smith

1. Definition of:
Nutrition 
Nutrients
Malnutrition 
2. What are the Nutrients that supply energy?
3. What are the Nutrients that regulate body processes?
4. What are the water soluble vitamins?
5. What are the fat soluble vitamins? 
6. Where are most vitamins absorbed?
7. What is the body system that breaks down food and absorbs nutrients?
8. What are the molecules that are the building blocks of proteins? 
9. What are the calories which contain little to no nutritive value; often come from solid fats or added sugars?
10. What are the two types of protein calorie malnutrition?

 Academic Career Report.mp4  
Click the link above
  overview of the Academic Career Report*.
Do NOT  turn in a Thank You Letter as part of this assignment

Please see the Academic Career Report video for directions on how to revise and complete attached resume  
A couple additional points:
1- Please remove the red and green references from your Resume.  I  had you do this exercise earlier in the semester to help you think  through how to organize.
2- Templates are not provided.  I am challenging you all to create based on the video lecture/ directions.

 Stephanie Renee Taylor Feedback:
1- Remove High School reference.
2- Tense issues.
3- Avoid first person in resume.
4- ‘Impact’ not provided in each of your ‘Experience’ bullets.
5- What are there things in brackets throughout the ‘Experience’ section?
6- Formatting inconsistencies.
7- Noticed redundant bullets – remember, this is not a quantity exercise.  It is a quality exercise.
8-  Professional Summary needs a bit of work: what is meant by the first  bullet?  What types of roles are you seeking post graduation?  You will  want to ensure the things you are highlighting in your Resume, as part  of your summary, correspond.

5
Title Written Out
Course Section
Date
By Student’s Name
Student ID
Abstract
Quickly tell the reader what to anticipate in this paper. Approximately 200 words. Here also mention the theory you are addressing your topic issue and paper around. Your abstract needs to be on its own page.
Keyword: Issue Topic (i.e. Option #1 – Diversity)
Introduction
This should be around two paragraphs. In the introduction, the reader should know what issue you are addressing. You should explain why examining this issue is important. This is the “hook” – to get you reader interested. This sets up the rest of your paper.
Case Studies/Review (Body of your Paper)
Body of paper with comparisons of articles and facts around theory. Here is where you are addressing your topic in a theoretical manner. Make sure the entire paper is 12-point font, New Times Roman, double-spaced with bolded section headers. The entire paper should be around 2,500-3,000 words. Make sure if you state an idea that is not your own, that you properly cite that reference using APA intext citations (Lard, 2019). Please see APA guides for help. Cite all statements that appear factual to prevent the appearance of conjecture or opinion as they are frowned upon in a scholarly research paper.
Often, I will have about one-two paragraphs that give more background regarding the topic issue and why it is important. One suggestion is to find recent data or stats that can substantiate your claim.
In the “body” of your paper, you may use “second headings” to further explore your issue. This would be were I would introduce the theory or conceptual framework that you are using. In this paper, you are going to be the subject matter expert. Assume your reader is a layperson and does not know anything about the theory or conceptual framework. I would provide an in-depth explanation of the theory; how it has been applied; critiques and criticisms; how the theory has evolved, and how it is perceived today. Write about how this theory is appropriate when looking at your issue. How does it help address the issue? Remember that this paper is your creation. These are just my opinions but if you want to write-it up differently that is your prerogative. Some papers have compared and contrasted different theories – which was very interesting. I would caution not to use more than three theories in this paper. We are looking for depth of analysis.
Discussion
This is where you wrap up your research with the theory, pertaining to the reason you wrote this in the first place, in other words, the problem.
Conclusion
Summarize and conclude your study, wrap it up concisely.
References
List all References here in alphabetical name by the Author’s last name. Make sure you use APA formatting. Your references need to be on their own page. This website is a good reference if you are unfamiliar with APA. http://www.bibme.org/citation-guide/apa/journal-article/

MY MAJOR IS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANYTING( IT) RELATED WILL WORK FINE
INSTRUCTIONS
 For this discussion, identify potential clients who may purchase your services. Compare what you are offering, even in a preliminary state, with the market potential of the services. Who are the clients you anticipate working within the long term? Will most of your clients be in a specific sector? What is the potential for long-term consulting with any given client? 

Psychiatricencounternote.docx

Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as a Word Document. See example template below for required format.  
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded. 
Demographic Data 
· Patient initial (one initial only), age, and gender must be Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPPA) compliant. 
Subjective 
· Chief Complaint (CC) 
· History of Present Illness (HPI) (symptoms) in paragraph format 
· Past Medical History (PMH): Current problem-focused and document pertinent information only. 
· Current Medications:  
· Medication Allergies: 
· Social History: For current problem-focused and document only pertinent information only.  
· Family History: For current problem-focused and document only pertinent information only.  
· Review of Systems (ROS) as appropriate:  
Objective 
· Vital signs 
· Mental Status Exam 
· Physical findings listed by body systems, not paragraph form. 
· Patient Health Questionnaires, Screenings, and the results (PHQ-9, GAD 7, suicidal) 
Assessment (Diagnosis/ICD10 Code) 
· Include all diagnoses that apply to this visit. 
· Include one differential diagnosis. 
Plan 
· Dx Plan (lab, x-ray) 
· Tx Plan: (meds) 
· Pt. Education, including specific medication teaching points.     
· Safety Plan        
· Referral/Follow-up 
*Based on population focus, some additional details may be required by faculty Top of Form 

COM 101
Research Proposal
(20 points, 750 words)
Objective
Students read an article and then generate a possible response to specific points made by the
writer. The student finds research to support that response. In an essay written for the
instructor, the student explains how a given piece of research will be used in the upcoming
research-based persuasive essay. The assignment engages comprehension, analysis, and
metacognition. The relevant course objectives are: 2, 3, 8, 9, 10.
The Task
Please read the article “‘I’ll Do My Own Research’: Why Americans Don’t Trust Experts
Anymore” by Stephen Altrogge. The link is in Canvas, but if it does not work, paste this link into
your browser:
https://www.trustsignals.com/blog/why-dont-americans-trust-experts-anymore
Review the assignment sheet for the Research-based Persuasive Essay. This proposal lays the
groundwork for that paper. I am your audience for the Research Proposal. You can use the first
person. You need to identify what content from the article that you’ll be addressing, and you
need to have some idea of what you want to argue. It does not have to be absolutely for
certain, but you need some direction.
Find four sources and in a single discussion paragraph for each one, identify the source, briefly
explain its content, and discuss how and where you plan to use the data in the persuasive
essay. Do not utilize quotations.
Thesis
Tell me what shall be the focus of your persuasive essay and what you opine. Briefly explain
your rationale and describe the types of information you will need to make your case. The
thesis should occupy a single, well-developed paragraph.
Discussion
Each source (four total) should be identified by author or title and the relevant content
summarized. Explain how you plan to use the data in your essay. Do not simply state the
obvious, such as “I plan to use the article to support my claim.” Be more specific without using
quotations. Each source should be discussed in one paragraph.
Conclusion
Ask me questions and voice concerns about composing the upcoming research-based
persuasive essay. My comments shall focus on your questions. If you do not ask questions,
you’ll receive a C at 70%.
Works Cited
MLA format required.
Guard against:
Writing a rough draft of the upcoming persuasive essay. Doing so will result in a D at 65%

Homework1.docx

Homework 1: 1 page and 2 references.
Examine how changing from a traditional to a long-term relationship with suppliers will affect each of the other departments (Sales & Marketing, Product Development, Warehouse, Logistics, Operations, Quality Assurance, Human Resources, and Finance).
Homework 2: 1 page
– Determine and describe how Maple Excellence Furniture Company can best utilize each of the strategic and non-strategic component contracts.
 -Maple Excellence Furniture Company is having difficulty deciding which items to make internally and which ones to outsource.  What are the key issues that they should consider for the furniture market?
Homework 3: 3 pages and 2 references:
This module focused on the Purchasing Department. For this portion of the project, answer the following questions and submit your answers as a Word document:
1. What are the primary and secondary objectives of this department?  
2. Are these objectives in conflict with other departments and, if so, why?
3. What are the largest challenges facing the department?
4. What are the challenges to integrating this department with the remainder of the supply chain?
5. How can technology help this department?

Reference:
Designing and Managing the Supply Chain; Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies. Simchi-Levi, Kaminsky & Simchi-Levi, (2022), 4 th edition, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 9780073403366

Rubric Criteria
collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Technology and Student Engagement
8 points
Criteria Description
Technology and Student Engagement
5. Target
8 points
Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is exceptional and skillfully describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is solid and logically describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is surface level and weakly describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is flawed and insufficiently describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology
8 points
Criteria Description
Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology
5. Target
8 points
Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are novel. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is innovative.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are suitable. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is noteworthy.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are artificial. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is shallow.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom are unrelated to increasing student engagement and motivation. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is unrealistic.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Accessibility and Equity to All Students
8 points
Criteria Description
Accessibility and Equity to All Students
5. Target
8 points
Convincing discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Concise discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Ambiguous discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Incomplete discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Digital Assessment Tool
8 points
Criteria Description
Digital Assessment Tool
5. Target
8 points
Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is ideal. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is sophisticated.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is apt. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is solid.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction does not demonstrate best practices. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is vague.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is inadequate. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is unintelligible.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Technology Barriers
8 points
Criteria Description
Technology Barriers
5. Target
8 points
Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are insightful and solutions provided for each barrier are creative. One barrier comprehensively addresses safe technology use in the classroom and realistically explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are credible and solutions provided for each barrier are logical. One barrier suitably addresses safe technology use in the classroom and accurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are cursory and solutions provided for each barrier are unfocused. One barrier minimally addresses safe technology use in the classroom and unclearly explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are unrealistic and solutions provided for each barrier are ineffective. One barrier irrelevantly addresses safe technology use in the classroom and inaccurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Rules and Procedures
8 points
Criteria Description
Rules and Procedures
5. Target
8 points
Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment provides new insight. Discussion proficiently describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is competent. Discussion successfully describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is inexplicit. Discussion minimally describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is unintelligible. Discussion fails to describe how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Technology Used for Communication
8 points
Criteria Description
Technology Used for Communication
5. Target
8 points
Realistic explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation thoroughly discusses how all families will have access to information.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Sound explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation logically discusses how all families will have access to information.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Weak explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation superficially discusses how all families will have access to information.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Poor explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation fails to discuss how all families will have access to information.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Dedicated Planning Time
8 points
Criteria Description
Dedicated Planning Time
5. Target
8 points
Convincing discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with realistic examples.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Significant discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with appropriate examples.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Ambiguous discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with unclear examples.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Insufficient discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with inappropriate or unrealistic examples.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Organization
8 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target
8 points
The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
The content is not well organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources
4 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.
5. Target
4 points
Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable
3.48 points
Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Approaching
2.96 points
Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.
2. Insufficient
2.76 points
Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Mechanics of Writing
4 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
4 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
3.48 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
2.96 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
2. Insufficient
2.76 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Total80 points
© 2024.  Grand Canyon University . All Rights Reserved.

NUR2811CProfessionalNursingLeadershipWritingPrompt1.pdf

MDC BLSON T.M. 11/2019 QEP Leadership Writing Prompt
School of Nursing QEP Writing Prompt
NUR 2811L (Professional Nursing Leadership NUR2811C) For this course, you will write a scholarly paper on Nursing Philosophy. Utilizing the four domains within the nursing metaparadigm you will include the following:
• A definition of the four domains: Nursing, Environment, Health and Person
• Your personal definition of each domain and how these fit into your philosophy of nursing.
• Compare and contrast the philosophies of Miami Dade College Benjamin Leon School of Nursing and at least one hospital.
• Conclude by summarizing and reflecting on what was learned from the assignment and how it will impact your practice in the future.
NUR 2811C Domains
1. Nursing
2. Environment
3. Health
4. Person
Requirements:
o Your paper must be APA format and at least 750 words not to exceed 1000 words.
o Double space your paper and use Times New Roman standard 12-point font.
o Proofread your paper; visit and present proof of seeing a writing tutor before submitting your paper to “Turn-it-in”.
o A minimum of two (2) scholarly references (ex. journal articles) must be used. APA format must be used in citing and referencing sources.

Preparation
Use the Internet to locate and analyze an information technology-based statement of work that has been publicly released.
Assignment Description
For this assignment, analyze your selected SOW and summarize the key elements that must be delivered in order to make the engagement successful. Consider the following and ensure they are all present in your SOW summary:
Does the SOW provide sufficient detail to focus the work necessary to make the project successful? Are there sufficient deliverable items (tasks or work packages) to identify progress? Are requirements defined?
Does the SOW clearly identify a point of completion (a point at which the work is considered satisfactorily done)?
Does the SOW integrate personnel requirements, equipment to be delivered, and other resource requirements?
Describe the content in the SOW regarding how legal disputes are resolved.
Based on these questions and others you may identify, what strengths and weaknesses did you find? How would you strengthen the SOW? How would you respond if the SOW was not executable (too weak to enforce)?